General Forums >> The Anonymous Zone >> Poll: Addicts

Rate

Poll: Addicts

456 Views
11 Replies Flag as inappropriate

Poll: Should treatment of patients with addictions be any different to other patients, eg refusal of certain treatments or ops?

back to top

Posted about 1 year ago

 

your thoughts?

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 year ago

 

are you a journo posting in anon?

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 year ago

 

no no, lol, im a student and iv just finished a topic on ethics and id like to what other students or nurses think of different ethicaal debates

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 year ago

 

You post a number of issues - all in the anon forum. I've responded to two of them there but I'm unhappy to keep doing so in the anon zone.


Any chance of posting them in a more 'up front' forum? Some of us are quite uncomfortable about responding in the anon forum. It's far too open to abuse and attacks by those who lack the confidence to stand by their words.


Cheers,


Stuart

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 year ago

 

im a little shy too be honest. im a first year and im worried my lecturers will see! lol

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 year ago

 

Well perhaps others will respond further to you here.


Cheers,


Stuart

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 year ago

 

yes, the obvious example is being declined a liver transplant due to being a heavy drinker.why should treatment be continually be offered to people who are just a drain on services through their own irresponsability.

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 year ago

 

 Think this touches a bigger issue here. Throughout our training it's continually emphasised that we have to be non-judgemental. However I accept it is difficult when you see someone like George Best for example, who had no intention of treating his new liver better than the old one!


Having said that I think that we have a duty to not pass that kind of judgement professionally. It would also become a case of where do you draw the line- bariatrics, smokers, drug addicts and even anorexics have all arguable 'done this to themselves' but you cant deny treatment due to poor lifestyle choices especially if they have a mitigating context. Many cardiac patients have not helped themselves by eating a diet that clogs their arteries but most people wouldn't dream of denying them treatment. Also who is to decide whether one patient is more deserving than another?


As much as its tempting to make value judgements, my view of a nurses role is to help promote health and treat those who are not healthy not to enforce. You can advise but ultimately people make their own choices!

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 year ago

 

Hmmm.  Should, for instance an unrepentant smoker or pie-loving fatty be denied treatment, while, for instance, the non-smoking, slim rapist or murderer who falls ill in prison be given it?  What about those who participate in sports?  No-one forced them to play rugby or ride horses, so why should the taxpayer support them when they are injured?  Should we deny treatment to those who develop drug-induced mental illnesses? Being an RMN I deal with people who will never be well enough to "contribute" to society and will cost the taxpayer thousands if not millions (far more than a couple of liver transplants that for sure) over a period of years or even a lifetime. 


The problem with denying treatment is where do we stop, because there will always be sound financial reasons not to give a certain treatments to certain people.  I must admit I'm not a fan of the "slippery slope" argument, but denying treatment for lifestyle choices is not something that sits well with me.


 

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 year ago

 

some very very interesting points here which i have enjoyed reading, i must say you have enlightened my thoughts on this subject as before reading the replies i would have to admit that even though i think everyone should be treated equally regardless of their addiction, my feelings on a patient waiting for a liver transplant and still hitting the bottle make me very mad.... when there are plenty who sadly do not recieve a new liver...or the patient with a drug induced mental illness, however as you said they are no different to someone needing cardiac surgery due to poor diet.. which lets face it we all have at some point.................i am not one to be judgemental but this debate has made me realise that maybe i am a little ... so thankyou all for helping me there as a 1st year student i have learned from this.


suzie

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 year ago

 

again i would have to say this is a very difficult question to answer.


i currently work on a ENT surgical ward and that vast majority of people we see requiring head & neck cancer treatment which usually results in a laryngectomy formation, are people who have smoked heavily, drank alcohol excessively, or both. but again we'd never dream of denying them treatment. likewise my previous employment on a vascular ward where people required bypass graft surgery, the atherosclerosis of their arteries is usually caused by smoking and/or a high cholesterol diet, to which a similar view to treatment is held.


there can be in reality a very poor opinion held towards addicts by some (and please note i say some) nursing staff. it is often what is said in the coffee room and not on the ward foor that is the true thoguhts of your peers and colleagues.  


i feel the best thing you can do is to uphold the equality of treatment for all patients with no execptions. unfortunately you may see repeated patient admissions for the same or similar problems, which some nurses become irritated by overtime, but i personally think it is important to help your patient to seek the appropriate support through the services available (if they wish to - as you can not force them to) and provide the same level of care as you would to the 'non-addict' patient in the bed next to them.